International Law Blog Postings

Archives for: April 2006

Columbia Wins 2006 Jessup International Moot Court

Permalink 01 April 06    Inside Justice ®   Renee Dopplick    Tags: News, United Nations    
After seven months of practice, research, and intense regional and national competitions involving over 2,000 students at 565 law schools worldwide, the final 104 Jessup teams from 81 countries converged in Washington, D.C. for the Jessup International Tournament. The Jessup competition simulates a case before the International Court of Justice in The Hague, the Netherlands. The 2006 Jessup Compromis dealt with theories of state succession, the jurisdiction of the ICJ, forced labor as a violation of international law, foreign sovereign immunity, indigenous peoples' rights to natural resources, public-private ventures, and the construction of a pipeline. The United States team from Columbia Law School won the Jessup World Champion Trophy. Columbia represented the State of Rubria (Respondent) in the Championship Round. The judges said Columbia Law School won the competition on the strength of its oral argument, beating the team from Universidad Catolica Andrés Bello in Venezuela, which represented the Republic of Acastus (Applicant). More


Today's Photo
view larger image

Recently Added

Call for Papers

Popular Categories

Legal Resources

Contact

  • Add an event online
  • Add deadline

Archives

April 2006
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
<<  <   >  >>
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
  

Legal News Headlines

Return of the State
This article is the extended address by José E. Alvarez, the Herbert and Rose Rubin Professor of International Law at New York University School of Law, at the University of Minnesota Law School's conference on "International Economic Law in a Time of Change." Alvarez relects upon and rebuts a collection of papers on supra-nationalism presented at the conference. He argues that states, as sovereign entities, are making a comeback. The full-text is available online for free.

Whither Justice? Uganda and Five Years of the International Criminal Court Michael Drexler argues that the International Criminal Court is pursuing an inappropriate engagement strategy in Uganda by ignoring the impacts of criminal prosecution and investigation on the prospects for peace to the country's decades-long conflict. It is published by the peer-reviewed Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Rights Law (IJHRL) and is available online for free.

World Photo of the Day

National Geographic's Photo of the Day
National Geographic

Blog Search Engines

twitter
Follow me on Twitter

      More Tweets ⇒