International Law Blog Postings
:: All Postings >>
Jessup Moot Court Competition - 21 Tips from 21 Judges

During the International Rounds of the 50th Jessup in Washington, D.C., 22-28 March, 2009, I asked 21 fellow judges for their thoughts on what advice they would give to future Jessup competitors. Until now, their advice has been as confidential as the Bench Memorandum provided to judges each year. A compilation of their recommendations is given below, along with additional suggestions from bailiffs, coaches, advisors, and national administrators. Your fellow competitors also graciously provided helpful hints, fondly termed "Reverse Tips."
I would like to extend my gratitude to all the contributors. The judges traveled from Asia, Africa, Europe, South America, and across the United States at their own expense and on their own time because they sincerely enjoy their lively discussions with you. They want to help you realize your personal victory - whether the Jessup leads to improved academic excellence, greater confidence and skills in your courtroom performance, enhanced appreciation for working as part of a team, and/or increased opportunities in your future professional career.
21 Tips from 21 Judges
Tip 1![]() Michael Akafai |
Tip 2![]() Maria-Angelica Burgos |
Tip 3![]() Morad EghbalNo other process trains future lawyers like the Jessup, as proven over the past 50 years. Jessup is the "Gold Standard" of moot court competitions. Participants must research, write memorials, and argue before the bench. Also, the competition is truly egalitarian. Even if your team does not advance, each individual still gains skills and valuable experience, which likely will be unlike any other part of your future law career. Yes, you will work with real clients, but those clients are not as likely to have cases that have the broad legal and social impacts as seen with the Jessup. Enjoy yourself and the opportunities to meet so many like-minded people who also share a passion for international law and justice. You now join a community of lawyers, united together by the instantaneous commonality of the Jessup. |
Tip 4![]() Larry Jortner |
Tip 5![]() Cynthia Lichtenstein |
Tip 6![]() Ulises Ruiz Lopart |
Tip 7![]() Pedro Martini |
Tip 8![]() Leo Matic |
Tip 9![]() Anouck Meier |
Tip 10![]() Anton Petov |
Tip 11![]() David Roghair |
Tip 12![]() Leila Sadat |
Tip 13![]() Gerald Schatz |
Tip 14![]() Ivan Shearer |
Tip 15![]() Jonathan Spare |
Tip 16![]() Raniero Spaziani |
Tip 17![]() Kwame Amankwah Twum |
Tip 18![]() Sophie Wernert |
Tip 19![]() Piet Willems |
Tip 20![]() Jana Zupikova |
Tip 21![]() Renee Dopplick |
Tips from Coaches, Advisors, and Bailiffs
- Advisor Pablo Arrocha (also an experienced Jessup judge in prior years) - Keep your arguments short and sweet.
- Coach Fernando Gonzalez - Remember that this competition is about having fun.
- Coach Anthony Daimsis (Ottawa) - Work with the judges' different styles.
- Coach (Anonymous) - Buy a prior year's international round from ILSA on DVD.
- Bailiff Carolina Aguirre - Know the Compromis and jurisprudence.
- Bailiff Ann-Marie Estrada - Do not say "clearly." Rarely is any issue in the Jessup Compromis "clear."
- Bailiff Vitaliy Yurkiv - Try not to answer starting from yes or no. First, if you use "yes" to indicate that you understood the question, the judges may mistakenly construe it as your agreement with the question or position. Second, a clear yes/no does not allow you to argue the gray areas of law. Also, the bench appreciates the use of "Mr. President" or "Madame President" when addressing the main judge, rather than the more general use of "Your Excellencies." Keep in mind that the judges tend to rotate positions on the bench and appreciate the sign of respect given to the lead judge. I recommend serving as a bailiff if you intend to compete. The process enables you to compare how teams: a) create an effective roadmap, b) allocate the time across team members and on what issues, and c) handle the variety of personalities on the bench.
- Bailiff Joseph Vardner - Do not fight the judges. Use your time wisely.
- Bailiff Gregory Parnas - With respect to your personality at the podium, do not be too stern or too relaxed. Strike a balance.
21 "Reverse Tips" from Your Fellow Competitors
Consider the following unattributed sage words of wisdom from your competitors as special "gifts" to your 2010 team. They asked me not to mention their names, saying that their highest reward will be watching you benefit from their advice next year.Tip 1. Your memorial states your legal position. Use the oral rounds to make emotional arguments.
Tip 2. Wobbly knees a problem? Try a couple shots of vodka before you enter the courtroom.
Tip 3. When the judges get tough, show your spunk and interrupt by speaking loudly over their questions.
Tip 4. When in doubt, make up facts. Be sure to cite a page number so they do not doubt you. Judges do not read the Compromis.
Tip 5. Remember, the Court is a legislative body and can make law.
Tip 6. If the judges look bored, try telling a joke. Try something along the lines of: "A judge, an oralist, and a bailiff go into a bar, . . . ."
Tip 7. "May it please the Court" is overused. Try frequently using, "May I please the Court?"
Tip 8. Make a team fashion statement: wear matching sport jerseys into the courtroom.
Tip 9. Forget calling the judges, "Your Excellencies." Instead, call them "Umpires."
Tip 10. Passing notes is old-fashioned and prohibited. Instead, send SMS text messages to each other during oral rounds.
Tip 11. Tweet from the lectern.
Tip 12. Flattering the judges is risky. Try bribery, or offer a hit from your vodka bottle that you brought for your wobbly knees.
Tip 13. Wink at the judges to drive your point home.
Tip 14. Judges get bored easily. Use large gestures and cast your oral arguments into song.
Tip 15. When in doubt, disagree with the judges.
Tip 16. If a judge asks whether you know of a specific case, always reply affirmatively and then bluff. Judges award points for brashness.
Tip 17. If your argument is going badly, buckle your knees and pretend to faint, forcing a rescheduling before a new bench.
Tip 18. Pretend not to see the "STOP" placard. You will be able to squeeze in at least another 30 seconds of your final argument.
Tip 19. Judges never ask the same questions so don't bother to research the answers between rounds.
Tip 20. Because the Compromis and Bench Memo for judges were written at least a year ago, there is no need to research recent cases.
Tip 21. If you want to win the "Best Oralist" award, always make sure your co-agent looks bad.
If you want to "vote" on which Reverse Tip you like the best, join the discussion on the Facebook Group: I'm participating in the 50th Jessup International Law Moot Competition.
Resources
Inside Justice - Jessup Resources
- 2009 Jessup International Moot Court Competition
- Please contact me (email link on the left side of the page) if you have additional tips to include here. Indicate whether you want to be identified or not.
Today's Photo

view larger image

view larger image
Recently Added
- International Criminal Justice Day - July 17
- Death Row and International Law
- Peru Grants Transfer of U.S. Citizen Convicted of Terrorism from Prison to House Arrest But Might Deport Her
- More blog posts ⇒
Call for Papers
Popular Categories
Legal Resources
Contact
Archives
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
Legal News Headlines
Return of the StateThis article is the extended address by José E. Alvarez, the Herbert and Rose Rubin Professor of International Law at New York University School of Law, at the University of Minnesota Law School's conference on "International Economic Law in a Time of Change." Alvarez relects upon and rebuts a collection of papers on supra-nationalism presented at the conference. He argues that states, as sovereign entities, are making a comeback. The full-text is available online for free.
Whither Justice? Uganda and Five Years of the International Criminal Court Michael Drexler argues that the International Criminal Court is pursuing an inappropriate engagement strategy in Uganda by ignoring the impacts of criminal prosecution and investigation on the prospects for peace to the country's decades-long conflict. It is published by the peer-reviewed Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Rights Law (IJHRL) and is available online for free.





















